Showing posts with label 2015 at 01:01AM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2015 at 01:01AM. Show all posts

Why Office Jerks Get Ahead

Think your boss is a psychopath? You may be right. New research finds that employees who displayed certain Dark Triad traits – psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism – are more likely to climb to the top of the corporate ladder than those who don’t show the traits.

University of Bern psychological scientists Daniel Spurk, Anita Keller, and Andreas Hirschi conducted the new study, concluding that high scores on some of these malignant traits were linked to better career prospects, including more leadership positions and higher salaries.

Even though the Dark Triad traits are associated with negative behaviors (e.g., lying, cheating, recklessness, manipulation) that can cost businesses billions, research also suggests that ruthless corporate climbers with the traits can also be charming, ambitious, and excellent negotiators.

PAFF_121015_OfficeJerksGetAhead_newsfeature

The researchers hypothesized that some of these sinister traits may help people succeed, while other traits may hinder career advancement. For example, people with high scores of Machiavellianism tend to crave power, control, and status — hence, they tend to actively pursue leadership positions and prestige. On the other hand, nobody likes working with a selfish jerk — Psychopaths often have difficulty working with other people, and are prone to impulsivity.

Spurk and colleagues collected surveys from a large sample of nearly 800 working German adults between the ages of 25 and 34.

Each of the participants was given a frequently used measure for Dark Triad traits known as the “Dirty Dozen” measure. The survey asked participants to rate the extent to which they agreed with statement such as ‘‘I tend to want others to pay attention to me’’ (for narcissism), ‘‘I tend to lack remorse’’ (for psychopathy), and ‘‘I tend to manipulate others to get my way’’ (for Machiavellianism).

Respondents then provided their monthly salary before taxes and leadership position within their organization, and completed a short self-report survey on their career satisfaction. In their analyses, the researchers also took various other  factors that could influence career success, like gender, job tenure, working hours, and occupational education, into account.

Sure enough, the results suggest that certain dark traits really do help people get ahead.

“Whether bad guys get ahead or fall behind seems to depend on the type of dark trait,” the researchers write in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science. “After controlling for other relevant variables (i.e., gender, age, job tenure, organization size, education, and work hours), narcissism was positively related to salary, Machiavellianism was positively related to leadership position and career satisfaction.”

The findings indicated that people who scored high on psychopathy, on the other hand, didn’t fare as well. The researchers found a negative association between psychopathy and successful career outcomes.

As psychological scientists Robert Hare and Paul Babiak explain in their book on psychopathy in the workplace, Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work, “The most debilitating characteristic of even the most well-behaved psychopath is the inability to form a workable team.”

Though psychopaths may be charismatic, smart, and talented, this inability to play well with others often prevents them from obtaining high levels of career success.

Interestingly, a comprehensive review on successful psychopaths recently conducted by Emory University psychological scientists Scott Lilienfeld, Ashley Watts, and Sarah Smith found that some psychopaths may possess distinctive traits that make them more likely to become successful leaders. While the bulk of psychopathy research has focused on prison populations, Lilienfeld and colleagues looked at research on people with psychopathic traits who also obtained professional success. These “successful psychopaths” tended to have higher scores on assertiveness, excitement-seeking, and conscientiousness compared to unsuccessful psychopaths.

Additional research on the mixed outcomes of the Dark Triad may help explain why so many organizations end up with a destructive Tony Soprano or Frank Underwood at the top.

 

References

Lilienfeld, S. O., Watts, A. L., & Smith, S. F. (2015). Successful Psychopathy A Scientific Status Report. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 298-303. doi: 10.1177/0963721415580297

Spurk, D., Keller, A. C., & Hirschi, A. (2015). Do Bad Guys Get Ahead or Fall Behind? Relationships of the Dark Triad of Personality With Objective and Subjective Career Success. Social Psychological and Personality Science. doi: 10.1177/1948550615609735

from Association for Psychological Science » Minds for Business http://bit.ly/1OVU6bY


Filed under: Science Tagged: Alexandra Michel, APS, Association for Psychological Science » Minds for Business, science, work
from Why Office Jerks Get Ahead

Feeling stressed? Try doing something nice for someone else.

Feeling seasonal stress? Try doing a small favor for someone else.   A study in Clinical Psychological Science found that

prosocial behavior moderated the effects of stress on positive affect, negative affect, and overall mental health. Findings suggest that affiliative behavior may be an important component of coping with stress and indicate that engaging in prosocial behavior might be an effective strategy for reducing the impact of stress on emotional functioning.

» Read the summary on PsyBlog: A Surprising Way To Cope With Everyday Stress

 

 


NOW AVAILABLE:  THE CASE OF THE DEFUNCT ADJUNCT 
  AmazonButtonBNKobo_logo.svgibooks

Blog  | Facebook  | GoodReads | LinkedIn | Twitter | Mailing List


Filed under: APS, PsyBlog, pychology, Science, Science! Tagged: Jeremy Dean, PsyBlog, stress
from Feeling stressed? Try doing something nice for someone else.

Sinful Science, A Miss Fortune Kindle Worlds Novella, is now available on Amazon.

 

 

A graduate student from Hawaii comes to Sinful, Louisiana to finish his fieldwork. He’d planned to spend a peaceful few weeks studying swamp rats. Instead, he discovers something that leads to Sinful’s darkest secret.

Sinful Science Cover5

I hoped my protective feelings toward Deputy Sheriff Carter LeBlanc weren’t too obvious. Against all of my training and better judgment, I’d done the one thing an undercover operative is never supposed to do: I’d gotten romantically involved. Things hadn’t progressed very far yet. Just a couple of dates, an innocent kiss, and me saving his life once or twice. On the plus side, Carter was handsome, goodhearted, and apparently attracted to me. On the minus side, I was living in Sinful under someone else’s identity, so our entire relationship was founded on a lie.

I’m grateful to Jana DeLeon for opening her hilarious Miss Fortune world to other authors via Kindle Worlds. I had a lot of fun in Sinful, Louisiana and I’m already planning to go back.


BE THE FIRST TO LEARN ABOUT PROMOTIONS, EVENTS, AND NEW RELEASES:

Blog  | Facebook  | GoodReads | LinkedIn | Twitter | Mailing List


Filed under: Buy, Frankie Bow, Fun, Kindle Worlds, Science, Science!, Writing Tagged: fanfic, Jana DeLeon, Kindle Worlds, Miss Fortune
from Sinful Science, A Miss Fortune Kindle Worlds Novella, is now available on Amazon.

The Good Bad Review

Before I was a mystery author, I was a college professor, so I’m no stranger to reviews. We professors have end-of-semester student evaluations, as well as public websites that invite students to rate their professors on such criteria as easiness, helpfulness, and –Heaven help us—hotness.  Some reviews are more helpful than others,  and, surprisingly,  the negative ones can be among the most useful.

No class is right for every student, and not every book can be a good fit for every reader.

On this point, it’s instructive to read the reviews for Sarah Caudwell, one of my favorite authors. Her books are very English, very mannered, and very funny. But Hemingwayesque, she is not.

Consider this opening passage from Caudwell’s first novel, Thus Was Adonis Murdered.

Scholarship asks, thank God, no recompense but Truth. It is not for the sake of material reward that she (Scholarship) pursues her (Truth) through the undergrowth of Ignorance, shining on Obscurity the bright torch of Reason and clearing aside the tangled thorns of Error with the keen secateurs of Intellect. Nor is it for the sake of public glory and the applause of the multitude: the scholar is indifferent to vulgar acclaim. Nor is it even in the hope that those few intimate friends who have observed at first hand the labour of the chase will mark with a word or two of discerning congratulation its eventual achievement. Which is very fortunate, because they don’t.

Here she sets up the persona of  Hilary Tamar, the pompous and not-so-self-aware Oxford don who narrates this an three additional adventures.  This paragraph isn’t a quick read, but in my opinion it’s a rewarding one.  It is definitely, however, not everyone’s cup of tea.

Favorable Goodreads reviews describe Caudwell’s first novel  as “very funny,” “an incredible plunge into British wit (second to none),”  “witty,” and “probably the most charming murder mystery that I’ve ever read.”

Now, let’s hear from the haters:

“If emotional involvement in a story is important to you, avoid this book at all costs…[a]smug, self-consciously witty, piece of tripe.”

If I’m looking for something mannered, witty, and not emotionally taxing, this one-star review wouldn’t necessarily put me off.  This is a review that does a service to potential readers, giving us a clear, if negative, perspetive. The next one is an even better bad review.

“Style-wise, I’d give it 5 stars–Ms. Caudwell is/was a terrific writer; very funny in a very British sort of way. But you have to accept the plot-style, which involves way more talk than action. The mystery is essentially sussed out via roundtable discussions and letters from the “suspect” (Julia) that, while incredibly enjoyable, aren’t a bit credible as letters. No one could relate verbatim dialogue in a letter as Julia is purported to do.”

This was voted most helpful negative review on the book’s Amazon page, for good reason. It tells the reader what the reviewer liked and disliked, and why. I am fully prepared to suspend  disbelief  for the sake of entertaining dialogue; others may not be.

Now, I have to give this next one-star review…one star.

“Couldn’t read more than a few chapters.”

If I didn’t know anything about Thus Was Adonis Murdered, this would not help me at all.  Why couldn’t the reviewer read more than a few chapters? Was there too much gore? Explicit sex? Typos and formatting errors? Did the reviewer recently emerge from a bank vault to find that she was the last person on earth, just as she dropped her only pair of reading glasses? Why couldn’t you read more than a few chapters, reviewer, why?

“Couldn’t read more than a few chapters” is a bad bad review.

I think there are two important lessons here:

  • you can’t (and shouldn’t) please everyone, and
  • a review says as much about the reviewer as about the thing being reviewed—and that’s a good thing. (I don’t wish to embarrass anyone, but I will say that if you have not yet mastered the spelling of “professor,”  you probably aren’t a good fit for my senior-level class.)

So when I say I appreciate honest reviews, I really mean it. But I should say that I mean helpful honest reviews.  If you have to leave a bad review, make sure it’s a good bad review.

And of course plain old good reviews are always appreciated.

 


PREORDER  THE CASE OF THE DEFUNCT ADJUNCT

CaseOfDefunctAdjunctFront

3.99 .99 introductory price 
AmazonButtonBNKobo_logo.svgibooks

BE THE FIRST TO LEARN ABOUT PROMOTIONS, EVENTS, AND NEW RELEASES:

Blog  | Facebook  | GoodReads | LinkedIn | Twitter | Mailing List


Filed under: Frankie Bow, Higher Ed, Impression Management, Writing Tagged: Amazon, good bad review, marketing, RateMyProfessors, Reviews, RMP, Sarah Caudwell
from The Good Bad Review

Author Interview on Amy Metz’s Blue Million books

 

You have a day job . . . how do you find time to write?

If you had a swear jar, would it be full?

What’s the worst thing someone has said about your writing?

Read the interview at A Blue Million Books

Win two signed books and a Bayside Made in USA Mahina State t-shirt

Win two signed books and a Bayside Made in USA Mahina State t-shirt

 


PREORDER  THE CASE OF THE DEFUNCT ADJUNCT

CaseOfDefunctAdjunctFront

3.99 .99 introductory price 
AmazonButtonBNKobo_logo.svgibooks

Blog  | Facebook  | GoodReads | LinkedIn | Twitter | Mailing List


Filed under: Adjunct, Author Interviews, Christmas, Frankie Bow, Giveaways, Higher Ed, Kindle Worlds, Writing Tagged: Amy Metz, Blue Million, defunct adjunct, Indie Authors, interview
from Author Interview on Amy Metz’s Blue Million books

Laura’s Interests reviews The Case of the Defunct Adjunct

 

If you like your cozy mysteries with humor and a satisfying dose of sarcasm, Frankie Bow is your go-to author.  Put Molly Barda and best friend Emma Nakamura together and you never know what can happen next. 

Win two signed books and a Bayside Made in USA Mahina State t-shirt

Win two signed books and a Bayside Made in USA Mahina State t-shirt

Read the full review at Laura’s Interests


PREORDER  THE CASE OF THE DEFUNCT ADJUNCT

CaseOfDefunctAdjunctFront

3.99 .99 introductory price 
AmazonButtonBNKobo_logo.svgibooks

Blog  | Facebook  | GoodReads | LinkedIn | Twitter | Mailing List


Filed under: Adjunct, Buy, Reviews, Writing Tagged: Case of the Defunct Adjunct, Laura's Interests, Review
from Laura’s Interests reviews The Case of the Defunct Adjunct

Author Interview: Richard Godwin, Wrong Crowd

Wrong Crowd

When Claude meets Maxine in the Caribbean he falls for her. He does not expect he will start an affair with her back in London, then again he does not expect to have to call on the help of his old mate Spike, nor that will they become embroiled with Russian gangsters Vladimir and Grigory.

But then Claude will do anything to hold onto Maxine.

Peopled with thieves, hustlers, gangsters, gun runners and pimps, Wrong Crowd is a slick and action-packed ride into London’s low-life. East End villains and the Russian Mafia collide in a fast-paced novel of deceit and criminal obsession that sparkles as it speeds towards its astonishing conclusion.

WRONG CROWDWrong Crowd
Genre: Suspense/Crime Mystery
Paperback: 198 pages
Down & Out Books (October 1, 2015)
ISBN-13: 978-1937495992
ASIN: B014Q19HM0
goodreads-badge-add-plus

 

 


Q: Richard joins me today to kick off the blog tour for Wrong Crowd. Richard, can you tell me a little more about the book? 

A: Wrong Crowd is about moral compromise. I have written many Noir novels and the two words I often think about when writing Noir is moral compromise. The novel is in many ways Noir, Noir the genre of losers, of seduction, of men and women who are not necessarily criminals but are corrupted somehow and lured across a line into crime. It is about seduction and sexual obsession and what happens when you mix with the wrong crowd.

Q: What kind of research did you do for your setting?

A: For my setting none as I live in London and the novel is set in London–apart from the first scene in Cuba, which I have been to.

Q: Tell me about something unexpected that happened when you when you were writing Wrong Crowd.

A: There was one key surprise. The Russian hit man Grigory literally began to take over as I wrote the novel. He delivered an extremely nasty surprise in an execution scene which changed the course of the action. I like to discover something about my characters as I write them, I call it the tangent. It adds drama and realism and Grigory did just that.

Q: What similarities and differences have you observed between English and American crime fiction?

A: English crime fiction tends to be more conservative but is moving towards the American style. I write more along the lines of American crime fiction, especially the hard boiled.

Q:  You’ve created in different literary worlds–poetry, academia, genre fiction–do you keep these entirely separate? Or do you apply techniques or lessons from one to another? I suspect the answer is the latter, judging from Professor Jay Gertzman’s review of Mr. Glamour, which he called “an anarchist philosophical novel” as well as a police procedural.

A: It is a good question and you are right. I like to mix them, I think it makes for interesting reading and unusual results, I call it hybrid fiction.

Q: Writing can be very solitary. How do you balance the need for solitude with the need to get out and be with people?

A: I am a social person, so I socialise a lot. I also travel widely.

Q: What’s one great piece of advice for any aspiring writers reading this? Anything you wish you’d known earlier in your career?

A: Find a time to write every day and try to stick to it. Read as much as you can and try to learn what the author is doing.


Richard-formal-248x300

About The Author –

Richard Godwin is the author of critically acclaimed novels Apostle Rising, Mr. Glamour, One Lost Summer, Noir City, Meaningful Conversations, Confessions Of A Hit Man, and Paranoia And The Destiny Programme.

He is also a published poet and a produced playwright. His stories have been published in numerous paying magazines and over 34 anthologies, among them The Mammoth Book Of Best British Crime and The Mammoth Book Of Best British Mystery, alongside Lee Child, as well as the anthology of his stories, Piquant: Tales Of The Mustard Man. His novels have sold numerous foreign rights.

Richard was born in London and obtained a BA and MA in English and American Literature from King’s College London, where he also lectured.

Author Links

Amazon US | Amazon UK  | Website | Blog| Twitter 

 


PREORDER  THE CASE OF THE DEFUNCT ADJUNCT

CaseOfDefunctAdjunctFront

3.99 .99 introductory price 
AmazonButtonBNKobo_logo.svgibooks

BE THE FIRST TO LEARN ABOUT PROMOTIONS, EVENTS, AND NEW RELEASES:

Blog  | Facebook  | GoodReads | LinkedIn | Twitter | Mailing List


Filed under: Author Interviews, Writing Tagged: London, noir, Richard Godwin, Wrong Crowd
from Author Interview: Richard Godwin, Wrong Crowd